India’s crypto tax rules combine a 30% special rate on income from transferring virtual digital assets, a 1% tax deduction at source on covered consideration and unusually strict restrictions on deductions and losses. The rules are simple to summarise but can be difficult to apply across hundreds of trades, wallet transfers, rewards and decentralised-finance transactions.
The previous version of this guide gave overconfident advice about gifting, staking and tax reduction. It also reversed the Section 194S thresholds. Those statements have been corrected. This page explains the statutory baseline and the records needed for a qualified tax professional to apply it.
India crypto tax rules at a glance
| Topic | General rule | Important qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Income from VDA transfer | 30% under Section 115BBH | Applicable surcharge and 4% cess may increase the total |
| Deductible cost | Cost of acquisition, if any | Other expenditure or allowance is generally disallowed under Section 115BBH |
| VDA transfer loss | No set-off or carry-forward under Section 115BBH | Application to multiple transactions requires careful computation |
| TDS | 1% of covered consideration under Section 194S | Thresholds, payer status and transaction method matter |
| Reporting | Schedule VDA in relevant returns | The Income Tax Department says ITR-2 and ITR-3 contain Schedule VDA |
| Platform reporting | Rules 242–244 apply to reporting crypto-asset service providers | Reporting begins for relevant calendar years starting January 1, 2026 |
This table is a starting point, not an individual calculation. Residency, business status, gifts, foreign assets and the legal character of a transaction can change the analysis.
Section 115BBH: the 30% VDA rate
Section 115BBH states that income from the transfer of a virtual digital asset is taxed at 30%. Applicable surcharge and the 4% health and education cess can increase the amount payable.
The section also states that:
- no expenditure deduction is allowed other than cost of acquisition, if any;
- no allowance or loss set-off is allowed when computing that income; and
- a loss from transferring a VDA cannot be set off against income under another provision or carried forward to a later year.
There is no long-term holding discount in Section 115BBH. Holding an asset longer may defer a transfer, but it does not by itself replace the special rate with a lower long-term capital-gains rate.
A basic sale example
Assume an investor buys a VDA for ₹4,00,000 and later transfers the same quantity for ₹5,50,000.
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Transfer consideration | ₹5,50,000 |
| Cost of acquisition | ₹4,00,000 |
| Illustrative income | ₹1,50,000 |
| Tax at 30% before cess or surcharge | ₹45,000 |
This example ignores fees, TDS credits, surcharge, other transactions and classification questions. It illustrates the arithmetic only. Section 115BBH generally does not permit trading and network fees as a separate deduction, although facts and accounting records should still be preserved.
Why loss restrictions can create a harsh result
Suppose one VDA transfer produces ₹1,00,000 of income and another produces an ₹80,000 loss. A normal portfolio view would show a net ₹20,000 gain. Section 115BBH’s restriction may prevent the loss from reducing the taxable VDA income.
That is why gross sale proceeds, transaction count and portfolio-level profit are not enough to calculate the liability. Maintain every acquisition and transfer separately, and have a professional confirm the method used for multiple lots and crypto-to-crypto swaps.
Do not assume “tax-loss harvesting” works for VDAs as it may for some securities. The statutory language specifically restricts loss set-off and carry-forward.
Section 194S: 1% TDS on consideration
Section 194S generally requires a person paying consideration to a resident for transfer of a VDA to deduct 1% of the consideration, subject to rules and thresholds. TDS is based on consideration, not profit.
The official Income Tax Department threshold guidance says no deduction is required when aggregate consideration during the financial year does not exceed:
- ₹50,000 when payable by a specified person; or
- ₹10,000 when payable by a person other than a specified person.
A “specified person” includes certain individuals or Hindu undivided families without business or professional income, and certain individuals or HUFs below the prior-year turnover limits defined in Section 194S.
The previous article had these thresholds backwards. Always check the current statutory text because tax law and form references can change.
TDS is a credit, not the final tax calculation
If an exchange deducts ₹1,000 on a ₹1,00,000 transfer, that amount is not necessarily the final tax on the gain. It is generally a tax credit to reconcile through official records and the return.
A high-volume trader can have substantial TDS deducted even with a low net economic return because the deduction is based on transfer consideration. Reconcile exchange statements with Form 26AS, the Annual Information Statement and any certificates or forms relevant to the transaction.
For an off-exchange transfer or consideration in kind, responsibility and mechanics can be more complicated. Section 194S and CBDT guidance should be reviewed before the transaction rather than after the filing deadline.
What counts as a transfer?
Section 115BBH applies the Income-tax Act definition of “transfer” to VDAs whether or not they are capital assets. A sale for rupees is the clearest example. A crypto-to-crypto exchange or use of a VDA for goods or services can also involve a transfer even when no cash reaches a bank account.
By contrast, moving the same beneficially owned asset from one personal wallet to another may not be a sale, but the records must demonstrate that ownership did not change. Bridge transactions, wrapped assets, liquidity pools and migrations can contain multiple technical steps whose legal treatment is not obvious from a block explorer alone.
Do not label every on-chain transaction taxable or non-taxable without reviewing its substance.
Schedule VDA and the return
The Income Tax Department says Schedule VDA is available in ITR-2 and ITR-3 for transaction-wise reporting. Official form material requests details such as:
- date of acquisition;
- date of transfer;
- head under which income is taxed;
- cost of acquisition;
- consideration received; and
- income from the transfer.
The appropriate return and whether income falls under capital gains or business/profession depend on the taxpayer’s facts. A frequent trader should not assume that selecting ITR-2 is automatically correct, and an investor should not select ITR-3 solely because an exchange calls activity “trading.”
Use the form and utility applicable to the assessment year being filed. Screenshots from a prior year’s return are not a reliable filing guide.
Staking, mining, airdrops and gifts
These categories need more care than a one-line tax rate.
Staking and protocol rewards
Relevant questions include when the recipient obtains control, whether the reward is income at receipt, whether an activity constitutes business and what cost is recognised on a later transfer. Liquid-staking tokens may also involve an exchange or separate asset rather than a simple reward.
Mining
Mining can involve business-income and expense questions at receipt as well as Section 115BBH treatment on a later transfer. The rule limiting deductions against VDA transfer income does not by itself answer every issue relating to a mining business.
Airdrops
An unsolicited token with no liquidity is not factually identical to a marketable token received for completing services. Preserve the date, conditions, control and reliable valuation evidence.
Gifts
Do not gift crypto as a generic “tax-saving strategy.” Relationship, consideration, Section 56 treatment, clubbing rules, cost to the recipient and later transfer can matter. A transfer that reduces one person’s immediate liability may create another tax or reporting obligation.
Obtain advice before treating any of these events as tax-free or assigning a cost basis.
Rule 243 and expanding crypto reporting
Rule 243 requires reporting crypto-asset service providers to maintain and report specified user, controlling-person, account and transaction information for relevant calendar years starting on or after January 1, 2026, subject to Rules 242 and 244.
The rule includes identity and tax-residence details as well as covered transaction information. This does not replace a taxpayer’s own recordkeeping. It makes reconciliation more important: an incomplete personal history may conflict with platform-reported data.
Offshore platform use does not erase Indian residency or reporting obligations. Foreign-asset and exchange-control issues may also arise depending on the facts.
Records to preserve
Keep original files rather than only screenshots:
- exchange order and trade exports;
- deposit and withdrawal histories;
- rupee value and pricing source at each relevant time;
- asset quantity and trading pair;
- wallet addresses and transaction hashes;
- fees and the asset used to pay them;
- invoices or agreements for work paid in crypto;
- staking, mining and airdrop records;
- TDS entries, AIS and Form 26AS data; and
- notes linking transfers between accounts you control.
Export data regularly. Platforms can close, restrict old history or change formats. Keep an encrypted read-only backup and never store seed phrases in a tax spreadsheet.
A safer filing workflow
- Export every platform and wallet history for the financial year.
- Normalise timestamps and identify the pricing source used for rupee values.
- Reconcile deposits and withdrawals between your own accounts.
- Identify sales, swaps, rewards, gifts, payments and uncertain transactions.
- Match TDS with official tax records.
- Review missing cost basis and unusual events with a qualified professional.
- Use the current return utility and validate Schedule VDA totals before filing.
- Preserve the calculation, source files and professional advice with the return records.
Tax software can help reconcile large datasets, but it cannot make a legally uncertain transaction certain. Review classifications and pricing instead of accepting every imported label automatically.
Bottom line
For 2026, the core framework remains a 30% Section 115BBH rate on VDA transfer income, strict cost and loss restrictions, and 1% TDS under Section 194S on covered consideration. Reporting is becoming more detailed under Rule 243.
The safest legal strategy is accurate recordkeeping and transaction-aware planning—not a loophole copied from a generic article. Consult a chartered accountant or tax lawyer familiar with VDAs when the history includes many trades, DeFi, foreign platforms, rewards, gifts or missing cost data.
This guide provides general information and is not personal tax or legal advice.
Advertisement
Sources and review
This article was checked against the primary or authoritative sources below on .
- Section 115BBH: Tax on income from virtual digital assets — Income Tax Department, Government of India
- Section 194S: TDS on transfer of virtual digital assets — Income Tax Department, Government of India
- TDS on payment for transfer of VDAs — Income Tax Department, Government of India
- ITR-2 frequently asked questions — Income Tax Department, Government of India
- ITR-3 validation rules for AY 2026–27 — Income Tax Department, Government of India
- Rule 243: Crypto-asset transaction reporting — Income Tax Department, Government of India
Frequently asked questions
Section 115BBH applies a 30% tax rate to income from the transfer of a virtual digital asset, plus applicable surcharge and 4% health and education cess. The exact total depends on the taxpayer's circumstances.
Section 115BBH says no deduction other than cost of acquisition and no set-off of a VDA transfer loss is allowed. Such a loss also cannot be carried forward under that section. Transaction-level application can be complex, so obtain professional advice.
Section 194S generally requires deduction of 1% of covered consideration paid to a resident for transfer of a VDA. Thresholds and responsibility for deduction depend on whether the payer is a specified person and how the transaction is conducted.
The Income Tax Department provides Schedule VDA in ITR-2 and ITR-3 for transaction-wise disclosure. The correct return and income head depend on the facts.
No simple rule fits every reward. Receipt, control, business activity, token value and later transfer can affect treatment. Do not rely on a generic statement that every staking reward is taxed at one particular rate.
Advertisement